Tuesday, May 14, 2013

The New Consciousness In The Vital

May 7, 1969

(Mother remains in meditation for a long time)
This Consciousness has started working in people's vital beings. Have you noticed? Some people had big vital difficulties - it's beginning to work in them. It's quite unexpected for me. You haven't noticed? <172>
I have an impression that it's more easy, that difficulties are less violent-that one has a greater mastery, if you like. That's my impression.
(Mother nods her head
silence)
And it's taken it into its head to compel me to concern myself with politics, and that bothers me. But if the time has come ...
I have the impression that just as it has tried, not exactly to dissolve religions, but to get inside them and remove barriers, it's taken it into its head to do the same thing with politics (if I may say so). It seems to be working to create, not a disharmony, but a sort of ... to take away cohesion among people: cohesion among parties, cohesion among religions. As though this Consciousness were doing that.
It's odd.
(silence)
But you have noticed something in the vital?
Yes ... I have noticed ... (how can I put it?) the presence of this Consciousness in the vital. Some people I see are almost exclusively in the vital, and there is the PRESENCE of this Consciousness, at work there.
And also I am compelled to intervene (not outwardly, but inwardly) in the actions of people involved in politics.
We'll see.
It's continuing its action of mentor of the body in an absolutely remarkable way That's going on well. But added to that, there are contacts in the vital, and also the obligation to intervene in certain political actions.
We'll see.

The New Consciousness

May 3, 1969

This Consciousness is very interesting. It has (smiling) ... it's not scorn, it's a sort of faraway indifference for all human ideas - all conventions, all principles, all moralities, it finds all of that ... absolutely grotesque. Now and then, it comes into contact with human ideas (Mother takes a surprised tone of voice): "Ooh! So that's what they think ..." It's amusing!
There are two things. Death, it doesn't at all understand what we mean by that, the importance we attach to it - but not at all. And then, money, to this consciousness, is buffoonery: this system of money, the invention of this system, which prevents you from doing anything unless you pull out a banknote, to it, really it's buffoonery. Strange, I suddenly realize that the psychic being (dominating gesture behind) ... the psychic being is almost like a witness, it's a witness to the whole evolution of things, and it KNOWS (it understands the deeper reasons, it knows how things are). It's in the body that this Consciousness is so active, and so, every time the body goes on with the little habits from the time when there was a mind and a vital, really it feels it as buffoonery. And the attitude with regard to money is like ... Death, food and money: this Consciousness feels those are the three "awesome" things in human life, that human life revolves around those three things-eating, (laughing) dying, and having money - and to it, the three are ... they are passing inventions which derive from a wholly transitory state that doesn't correspond to anything very deep or very permanent. That's its attitude. And then, it teaches the body to be otherwise.
It tolerates food, provided it doesn't take up too big a place and isn't too cumbersome or too important; it says, "Very well, that's the way you're built, too bad for you, you've got to eat." (Mother laughs)
And then, death ... Just yesterday (yesterday afternoon), I had an example. An accident took place, have you heard about it? [[A teenage girl drowned in the Ashram's swimming pool in the presence of her whole group. ]] They're really wondering how it happened. As for me, I INSTANTLY saw that there was in the girl a psychic will (which she wasn't conscious of: she only felt an unease), but there was a psychic will to die (why? I don't know, I haven't yet seen why). That was clear. <165>
And how everything was arranged to favor that, it's almost miraculous (you don't talk about it because people will say you're going mad if you call such a misfortune "miraculous"). But habitually, all those who go into the swimming pool have to put their name down when they go out (that's the rule). Yesterday, the man who kept the register had asked to go to Madras at 6, so he wasn't there and no one's name was noted down, and so they didn't know ... Things like that. She went to see the group's captain and told her, "I am tired, I don't feel well, I want to go"; the captain said, "Yes, yes, you can go." (Of course, it was foolish not to check that she had left; the captain was busy and just thought, "All right, she's leaving.") The girl was then at the shallow end of the pool - impossible to get drowned there, unless you do it quite deliberately (they found her at the other end). But the pool was full of people - nobody saw anything. You see, everything was arranged just to ... force her to die. [[Let us note that the girl's sister, who was very close to her, should have accompanied her to the swimming pool, but was away on that day And when the girl's body was taken to the hospital and put under an oxygen tent, after two minutes the oxygen was exhausted and there was none left in the whole hospital. ]] Every precaution is in place, and not one worked .... And as soon as they told me the news of the accident, as soon as I was told, I immediately looked, and I saw, in the place of her psychic, a peaceful will, like this (Mother stretches out her two arms in an immutable gesture). They were working hard: they worked for hours; first they took all the water out (they know how to do that), they drained the body of the water, then started working-tractions and all that to try to make her breathe again - they worked for hours (they were ready to work the whole night), they did all they could. And the psychic was like this (same gesture), that is, immutable, determined. But she didn't know [that she was going to die]: it came through her vital to reach her, and she felt quite ill at ease, she said, "Oh, I want to go out." So they told her, "Yes, that's right, you should go ...." And because she had said that, naturally no one was worried when they didn't see her (no one had put their names down, so they couldn't check); it's only when they found her clothes ... She had been under water for over an hour.
This Consciousness was so conscious of the movement in everyone, of every reaction, it was extraordinary! And it's this Consciousness that saw this, that showed me this: a psychic like this (same immutable gesture), like an irrevocable decision. And for this Consciousness, you understand, it's like someone who decides to move to a new house, or to a new room, or even to change clothes .... "Why do you make so much, so much fuss about that?" <166>
I haven't said any of this, because ... I haven't said anything to anyone.
(silence)
Last year, you remember, there was a boy who drowned at Gingee: [[It was three years ago, in a pond, during an outing. See Agenda VII of 17 December 1966. ]] that was with P. [the group's captain]; and this little one, it was with B., R's sister [also a captain]. So I looked: outwardly, they are vitally very strong and very egocentric, which would be the external, material reason that allows the accident to take place-that is, no intuition of other's needs or state: no contact, they're like this (gesture closed in on oneself), but with an inner solidity on which, the psychic was leaning, for both of them [the two captains].
The other one too [the boy who drowned in the pond] wanted to go, but in his case it was very interesting: I saw Sri Aurobindo come and fetch him under water, and Sri Aurobindo said, "He will be born in the family" (he came back in a child), "he will come back in the first child to be born in the family." And this girl, I don't know yet what will happen, but her psychic being WANTED to go (for some reason or other). [[See in addendum Mother's comments to a disciple regarding this "accident." ]]
(silence)
The strange thing is that when you see things with this Consciousness, the PERFECTION of the organization is so TREMENDOUS that you are ... you're almost terrified! Normally, when she went down to the bottom they should have noticed it immediately-they would have brought her up and it would have been over (they know very well how to do that, nothing would have happened).
(silence)
For this Consciousness, apart from a few individuals, human beings are weak. They are weak beings. Highly speculative, imaginative, very highly active in the mind, oh, tremendously active; that gives it a sense of ... oh-oh, what agitation! But like that, from the psychophysical standpoint, weak.
Since it began, I've told you several times about this sense of a FORCE, an absolutely unusual force (I am not the only one: all those who are in contact with this Consciousness say they feel a force ... an extraordinary force). And it's this Consciousness. But it has a different character: it's a force that sees things differently, wholly differently. <167>
So then, for instance, these two I mentioned [P. and his sister, the two captains], from a human standpoint, you would say they're really insensitive - it's because they're insensitive and too egocentric that the accident took place. In other words, a reproach. In this light, "Oh, these are good instruments, one can lean on them [[Let us note that P. and his sister are both very muscularly solid. ]] (solid gesture), they won't sag, they're strong enough for one to lean on them." And all that is shown to the body, which is really beginning ... (laughing) to know things no body had ever learned before - ever. And to see life quite differently It feels ... (laughing) you know, it feels stupid, that is, consciously it's in one way, and then out of atavism, out of construction, it's tied down in the other way. So it feels very silly, very silly But the Consciousness held it (with yesterday's event), it HELD it in its Consciousness like that, present, until it had really understood everything in detail, and once it had really understood, poff! the thing was gone, finished. So it understands that when something is held like that, it means there's something to understand, it has a lesson to learn, and when the lesson has been learned, when it has understood, seen clearly-once it has seen clearly and it's all simple and very clear - that's it, poff! it's gone, finished (gesture showing the Consciousness letting go of the body), as though the thing were quite taken away That was taking place at night, while I am not disturbed (the night hours are the only ones when I am not disturbed every minute; I can carry on with my work untroubled), and then I saw. And that night was so peaceful, but with such peace! ... It's ten rungs above the ordinary material "peace," completely You know, the peace of a psychic will so powerful (Mother stretches her arms in a sovereign gesture), so tranquil ... that all our emotions, our reactions, all that absolutely looks like childishness. But the body understands very well (since this Consciousness came it has begun to understand lots of things), it understands that all that [emotions, reactions] was a necessary path to prepare receptive instruments.
It's really interesting.
There are all the vibrations, the little tensions in beings, and this Consciousness shows (it shows very clearly) how that is the cause of disorganizations, illnesses, distortions ... that vibration of constant trepidation - a vibration of weakness.
(silence)
<168> There was one thing. This little one, they're going to cremate her now. So they came to me with a tray of flowers to show me the flowers they were going to place on her body And there [with the tray], there was something of the little one - a psychic embryo; it was there, and it made a slight movement ... suddenly, a movement of such a deep tenderness. She was like this (gesture in front of Mother, with the tray of flowers), I took a rose, and it was as though I gave it to her in her hand; I gave it and said, "Here, it's for you." And all that, all those vibrations, it was all luminous, lovely, and she (the conscious part in her) was so per-fect-ly happy! ...
How can you tell that to the parents? They would say, "You're crazy ..."
But that's the FACT, the plain fact: I saw Champaklal come with the tray of flowers, and it [the psychic embryo] was floating above, like that; so when I saw her, I took a rose and ... there was something so lovely, so luminous, like that (a very small thing, not a great force or anything), but so lovely, so luminous, so happy, with such a sense of repose ....
And how many times it must happen like that!
Mon petit, we don't know anything! Day after day after day, I am increasingly convinced that WE KNOW NOTHING. We think we know, we think ... and we know nothing. We are in the presence of hidden wonders that elude us completely because we're idiots. There.
But with this Consciousness, there is the why of everything: everyone's reaction, why he acts in that way, and ... And since it's been there, not once have I seen in this Consciousness a reproach-not once did it reproach anyone. It has explained everything in such a way that it becomes so luminous, so understanding as to make you wonder, "Why should one reproach anyone? ..." Oh, for it, moral notions are something ... something ultra-stupid. But I told it (I am still telling it) that they were necessary in the course of evolution to refine matter and open the way to certain forces: if people had been from the beginning wholly satisfied with themselves, they would never have progressed. But now, it's time to see-time to see.
The vast majority of humanity is unconscious (what I call unconscious, that is, without contact with the Consciousness, not CONSCIOUSLY in contact with Consciousness), the vast majority; but for one who is capable of being above circumstances with a clear and precise vision of the why and the how ... it's wonderful.
There.
It's what Sri Aurobindo wrote in Savitri: God grows up on earth -God grows-but man ... (laughing), the wise man talks and <169> sleeps ... and no one will notice it till the work is over. [[Savitri, I.IV.55. ]] That's how it is. And he knew it.
(silence)
Do you have any news? ... Nothing?
Do I have a contact with this Consciousness?
Do you ...?
Have a contact with this Consciousness?
(Mother opens her eyes wide) I never even asked myself the question! I took it for granted.
But I can't make out the difference: for me there's always "the force," so ... I can't tell the difference between forces.
No, but I ... Mind you, if I hadn't had that experience of January Is', when I felt it come - I felt it, saw it come, it was wholly concrete, like ... like someone coming into the room, you understand, that concrete. So that's what made me take notice, otherwise I would have found it to be the normal course of the development. But that experience alerted me; that, and the fact that three people felt it before I said anything, and those three people told me about it before I even said a word. They told me about it while asking me, "What has happened?" That's what I found interesting. But, for me, it was the same thing as for them, there was no difference; I told them there wasn't any difference in gradation - it wasn't that this Consciousness was more intimate with me than with you all: it's the same thing, it was like someone coming in. But a someone ... superlatively conscious. That's what caused me to note the fact; otherwise I would have taken it as the course of the development, like you.
And it did that thing ... (it was the first time it happened to me ...
You see, I was asked, "What is the condition one should be in to fully receive this Consciousness?" So I was here, sitting like this, and the person was sitting where you are (a little more to the side), and I saw with my open eyes the Consciousness (not this consciousness: the Supreme Consciousness) come down (gesture like a column of light before Mother) ... That, mon petit, it can't be described .... <170>
I was like this (eyes wide open), and I saw it come (same gesture like a column) and settle down on the wooden floor like that, about this size (gesture: about five feet wide). All the rest was as usual (Mother shows the furniture, her bed, which she could see as usual), and there was "that" which I saw with these very eyes. Then this Consciousness took my consciousness (revolving gesture starting from Mother's left side, going through the column of light in front of Mother, and returning on the right side): I didn't see anything [i.e., any shadow]. I wondered whether it had gone through the column (yet I FELT it while going through). And then, so I would understand clearly it took the consciousness of the person sitting there and made it go through [the column of light], and I saw a slight form, I saw a blue form in the place of the head .... That was a weakness. For a long while I saw, I looked, then it went away all of a sudden. You know, it's so independent of one's will, aspiration, movements of consciousness - of everything. And like this: visible for this body - on its scale, you understand. Fantastic!
This body was accustomed to having experiences under the psychic's influence, in its adoration for ... the Supreme Conscious Truth - in adoration. Its whole joy was there, it was fully satisfied. But since that time, it has had experiences - which the other parts of the being had IN THEIR OWN WAY, but now this way this physical way is so concrete! ... So concrete and tangible .... The body can say, "I have SEEN the Supreme Consciousness," like people in the past who said, "I have seen God." - This body doesn't believe in God ... it believes in something much better than God! (laughter)
There. Is that all? Do you have anything to ask?
No, Mother.
Nothing? ... Mon petit, I can tell you (I don't like to tell things that look like compliments or flattery, that's why I don't say anything, but since you've asked me ...). As a matter of fact, I feel that this Consciousness moves about in you without meeting obstacles. It's only materially: the physical needs a slight encouragement to let itself ... be kneaded, so to speak, so you may become physically really receptive - but in my case, my body can't say anything, because it too is like that: it has that same difficulty, a pain here, a pain there, this here, and that ... all the time small things that ... For them to disappear, it has to remember. It's the only thing, it's analogous to you. But the Consciousness moves about (Mother makes a wavy gesture, pointing to Satprem's body), I see it move <171> about, always unhindered - unhindered, like something natural. You understand, it's like something natural: it goes through like this (same wavy gesture), perfectly natural. So it's all right! (Mother laughs)
***
ADDENDUM
(Mother's comments, noted down from memory by a disciple, in English, about the teenage girls drowning in the swimming pool.)
P. spoke to the Mother in detail at 1:30 p.m. today about the findings of his inquiry of yesterday's incident. To that the Mother said:
"I can tell you about the result of 'my' inquiry - the inner inquiry. Last night I was busy all the time looking at this incident. I found that it was her soul that took this decision - she was not conscious - but her soul wanted to go ... to leave her body. From the facts that I gather from you it seems that there was not enough reason for her drowning - in spite of it her soul managed to leave her body.
"This fact was further supported when this morning Champaklal brought a dish of flowers to be burnt on her body. I saw a pretty little flame in the center of the dish. Generally I do not give any flowers on the dish; I send it as it is. But today I was specially interested, I took a rose and put it on the flame of the dish. The flame grew big and it was glowing wonderfully - it was very beautiful."

Monday, May 13, 2013

Body"s Identifcation With Everything

I would like people not to put me in a box and shove the body ... like that, because it will be aware of it, it will feel it, and that will mean adding one more misery to all those it has had. Let them wait till it deteriorates. I am saying this to you, so you will be able to say it to others if necessary.-THE MOTHER


May 24, 1969

It's difficult .... The English would say, it's not a joke .... Everything, everything is getting disorganized, everything is disorganized.
It's easy to see that it's getting disorganized TOWARDS a higher organization, that is, a broadening, a liberation - that's true ... but nothing, nothing at all is working in the ordinary way any longer. So the body can no longer eat, can no longer ... Sleep, of course, for a long time there hasn't been any ordinary sleep (I don't regret it), but everything, just everything is like this (gesture of upheaval).
(long silence)
It's a very strange sensation: no relationship remains as it was before. Nothing: neither of the body with itself, nor of the body with others, nor anything; it's all ... like something that has disappeared. Now and then, you know, it's like a breath of air passing by, a small thing ... I can't say how it is - charming. It's not a pleasure, not a joy, it's ... a breeze passing by, something quite special - and charming, quite charming. You drink a drop of something, which the minute before was absolutely dull-it's not intense, not violent, not strong, but ... charming. The next minute, it's gone.
The body suddenly feels a sense of peaceful and luminous rest, something quite ... adorable - the next minute, it feels pain all over.
So everything is like that.
A sort of identification with everything, which is far from being too pleasant (it's not unpleasant either), but ... it gives a bizarre impression of life. Everything is like that. One moment, the impression that you don't depend on anything, that you are an expression ... (how could I put it? [Mother smiles]) an expression of the Lord, and that you depend on nothing; the next minute, that you are nothing at all, merely a sort of semiconscious movement in the middle of a general semiconsciousness - very unpleasant. It's like that, and all the time like that .... At one time, things become so ... (what should I say?) repugnant, almost, that you feel like screaming - and in fact, if you don't keep a check on yourself, you do start screaming. Another time ... everything is so peaceful that you feel as if you are entering an eternity So you understand ... All that you can do in the middle of all that is to be still!
Then, it comes along with an awareness (not a mental perception: <193> an awareness) of all that people think, all that people feel, all that ... it's all oh, so pitiful! It's so pitiful .... As I said, one minute, suddenly there's something absolutely marvelous; and the next minute, it's ... So the body, one can't say it finds that very amusing, no, but it ... It doesn't rebel in the least, not in the least, it says, "Since it's like that, it has to be like that." Sometimes, now and then, it aspires to get somewhere.
You see the condition.
As a result, I can no longer, I can no longer even ...-for instance, previously, when someone told me he had difficulties or was unhappy or ... it was very simple, spontaneously I would say, "But just think of something else, think of the yoga, and you'll find peace" - I can't even say that any longer! Because I can't tell people, "Do as I do and you'll be in peace"! It's true that I don't have a single care - not one care. One day (it was yesterday or the day before, I don't remember), everything seemed to go haywire-everything everywhere: everybody, all circumstances, all things - every thing, on the scale of the earth. Not on a small scale, on the scale of the earth. On a small scale: complete disorder; on a general scale: complete disorder. But even that the body can still see and smile at. But you see, it can't eat anymore, or it throws up all that it eats, or ... Complete disorder. I can't say it finds that perfectly all right, but it doesn't find it unbearable; it says, "It's like that, so it's like that." Because there's always, always this, this which doesn't budge (gesture above the head, like an unshakable will), there is always the consciousness of ... reaching, reaching the Lord, the Supreme Consciousness ... reaching the Lord. This is stable. This is durable. And then: "If all this still has to dissolve, it will dissolve; if it can evolve, it will evolve; if it has to go through all these troubles, which really aren't very pleasant, it will go through them." This doesn't budge (same gesture above the head). And it even comes - when things begin to be troublesome enough, it comes like this: "To be what the Lord wills .... What You will."
There.
So I've stopped speaking - I am speaking just now, but I have stopped speaking because ...
And a sort of fluidity (gesture spread all around): either what people have comes here, or what's here goes out there, or ... A fluidity like that ... which isn't particularly pleasant. It's interesting, even amusing at times-it's funny, comical. But I can't say it's very cheering.
I didn't even know if I would say anything, because it's really not <194> ... really not pleasant to say ... How long is it going to last? I don't know ... There are times when you feel it can't last, it's going to end; and there are times when you feel it can go on like that for an eternity. And then, when it's like that, when there is that feeling ... "Why? Why, why all this? Is it really any use to have a manifestation like this, which lasts eternally like this? What's the use? ..." If you have the vision of a Beauty and a Joy, a Harmony, then you say, "All right, let's go through the difficulty and then we'll arrive there," but this way, if things must always be as they are ... So there.
And then, as I have said, from time to time, for ONE second (not even one second), a joy ... something ... I can't say, it's neither joy nor pleasure nor happiness, nor any of all that, it's ... something adorable-which may be nothing: it may be a taste, or a perfume, or a gesture, and then ... it disappears. If the world were constantly like that, it would be a wonderful thing! Wonderful, inexpressibly wonderful, but ... But impossible to be all alone like that, it's not possible. It's not possible, there is all that comes from outside (gesture like a truckload being dumped) and which ... So if we have to wait till everything is changed ... phew!
It's obvious that the creation CAN be a wonderful thing - it seems to be the opposite of that. But how is the one going to change into the other? ...
(silence)
The body has reached a state of consciousness in which it knows that death can bring about a change, but isn't-isn't a disappearance (disappearance of the consciousness). And then, that idea the vast majority of human beings have: the repose of death ... (Mother puts her hand on her mouth, as if before an extraordinary piece of nonsense). Not even that consolation. For most people, it's the opposite of a repose. So then, there too, but even more acutely and intensely: "The only, the SOLE hope is ... You, Lord, to be You. Let there be nothing but You. Let this separation, this difference disappear, it is MONSTROUS!" Let it disappear. Then, let it be as You will: You in full activity, or You in complete repose - it doesn't matter in the least; whether it is this way or that way, either way it's completely, completely unimportant; the important thing is that it should be You.
There's the absolute CERTITUDE (Mother clenches her two fists) that there's only ONE way out of all that, only ONE - only one, not two, there's no choice, there aren't a few possibilities, there's only one: it's ... the supreme Door. The Marvel of Marvels. All the rest <195> ... all the rest is an impossibility.
And all that is the experience of this (Mother points to her body), it's not mental, but wholly and completely material.
I see, you know, because people's consciousness is an open book for me (there's no difference, it's an open book), and so I see: in the vast majority of people, when things become really difficult, there is that idea (that sort of idea is always there): "Oh, one day, all that will be over." - What a joke!
(silence)
But why? ... Why? ... Now and then the body worries: "Why? Why, why all this, why? ..." When it sees, when it's in contact with suffering, people, miseries, difficulties, why, why? Why ... why?
(Satprem lays his forehead on Mother's feet)
Since this Creation can be a marvel identical with the Supreme Consciousness, why, why did it have to go through all this? (Mother draws a circle that comes back to its starting point)
Now and then that comes to it.
But obviously, it's idiotic, because it's useless - it's like that, so it's like that. All the whys will not prevent things from being like that. All that we have to do is to find the way for them no longer to be like that, that's all.
(silence)
I always think of Buddha and all of them: we'll go and merge with the Lord, and then there'll be nothing left! (Mother takes her head in her hands)
So then, for their theory to be credible, they say ... (laughing) that it's all an "error." And they don't see the stupidity of their theory: that the Supreme Lord should have been capable of an error ... and then should have repented and withdrawn from it!
These people, all these people, the more convinced they are, the more you feel they are shut up in blinkers.
(silence)
But in fact, your body is a symbol of the whole earth.
It seems to be like that.
So everything comes to you to be purified. <196>
Yes, but that doesn't console me, the body couldn't care less!
Yes, but I feel that once anything has touched you, it can't go back into the world as it was before.
It seems to be so; there are constantly extraordinary things taking place. Constantly, all the time, every minute, I hear really extraordinary things.
But that doesn't console the body! ... It doesn't have any selfesteem.
Yes, but that serves some purpose.
Oh, yes!
It purifies - it must purify the world.
The body doesn't even worry about its purification .... I don't know how to explain .... It's night and day, ceaselessly, "What You will, Lord, what You will ...." You understand, "what You will" in the future, instead of "what You want" in the present, because it's not only like this (gesture inward), but also like that (gesture outward, spread out). "What You will, what You want." That's all. And that's its perpetual state.
(silence)
Because, of course, one very clearly feels how everything is grating.
(Mother laughs,
silence)
At any rate (this is very clear), the consciousness striving to help the body in the work has made it understand per-fect-ly well that going away isn't a solution. Even if there was earlier a curiosity to know what the body will be, that curiosity is gone; as for the desire to stay on, that went away long ago; the possible desire to leave when things become a bit ... suffocating went away with the idea that it would change nothing at all. So only one thing remains for the body: to perfect acceptance. That's all.
When it doesn't talk about it, it's relatively easier; when it expresses it, it becomes very concrete.
There. <197>
The only thing that really consoles it (but not for long) is the idea, "What you are doing is useful for all; what you are doing isn't for you, a stupid little person, it's for the whole entire creation to profit by it." That's what gives it patience.
But when there are people with, you know, a great goodwill (with perhaps a little ambition) to do some work too, I tell them, "If it comes, take it, but don't pull it to you ...." A part of the creation had to do the work for the whole (that's obvious-obvious), and, well, what speaks [i.e., Mother] happens to be at least a part. There had to be someone. That's good; it's like that, so it's like that; there's no point being ... It's like that, so it's like that.
Ah, it's only asking to do the work properly, and that's all.
The body is aware of a very deep stupidity, and it realizes that because of that stupidity, the whole entire universe is the way it is.
And its perfect incapacity to get out of it ... It's a question of Grace, that's all .... There are some seconds when everything is so wonderful as to be unbelievable, and then, the next second ...
There. It's better not to talk about it.
(silence)
One would like to help you better.
Mon petit, you are helping me as much as you can. It's very good .... There's one thing: you are the only one I can talk to. And that's good. From a general standpoint, I am very grateful for that -you are the only one I can talk to. The others don't understand.
The others don't understand.
I don't know. I don't know what will happen. There are times when things become so difficult that I wonder if the body will be able to hold out, but I would like ... I would like people not to put me in a box and shove the body ... like that, because it will be aware of it, it will feel it, and that will mean adding one more misery to all those it has had. Let them wait till it deteriorates. I am saying this to you, so you will be able to say it to others if necessary.
Yes, certainly. [[Satprem was still under the illusion that he could "say" something. ]]
<198>
It doesn't desire that, it doesn't fear it - things will be as they will have to be, that's all. Only, it would really like people to understand ... to understand the effort it has made, and not to rush to (gesture of getting rid of a burdensome body) shut it in, with a heap of earth above it. Because even long after doctors will have declared it to be dead, it will be conscious: its cells are conscious.
So there, that's all.
I don't know ... maybe ... You know, there's such a long way to go that it appears ... absolutely miraculous. And the other thing ["death"] seems to me more and more idiotic. So I am like this (gesture in between). It's really a queer condition: you're not alive, you're not dead.
Ah, good-bye, petit.

Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Sri Aurobindo Faith And Shakti

Sri Aurobindo on faith and shakti

From The Synthesis of Yoga, Part IV, Chapter XVIII, Faith and Shakti.  
rule
 
by Sri Aurobindo
 
Indian Goddess, by Paul Edmonston
    THE three parts of the perfection of our instrumental nature of which we have till now been reviewing the general features, the perfection of the intelligence, heart, vital consciousness and body, the perfection of the fundamental soul powers, the perfection of the surrender of our instruments and action to the divine Shakti, depend at every moment of their progression on a fourth power that is covertly and overtly the pivot of all endeavour and action, faith, Sraddha. The perfect faith is an assent of the whole being to the truth seen by it or offered to its acceptance, and its central working is a faith of the soul in its own will to be and attain and become and its idea of self and things and its knowledge, of which the belief of the intellect, the heart's consent and the desire of the life mind to possess and realise are the outward figures. This soul faith, in some form of itself, is indispensable to the action of the being and without it man cannot move a single pace in life, much less take any step forward to a yet unrealised perfection. It is so central and essential a thing that the Gita can justly say of it that whatever is a man's Sraddha, that he is, yo yacchraddhah sa eva sah, and, it may be added, whatever he has the faith to see as possible in himself and strive for, that he can create and become. There is one kind of faith demanded as indispensable by the integral Yoga and that may be described as faith in God and the Shakti, faith in the presence and power of the Divine in us and the world, a faith that all in the world is the working of one divine Shakti, that all the steps of the Yoga, its strivings and sufferings and failures as well as its successes and satisfactions and victories are utilities and necessities of her workings and that by a firm and strong dependence on and a total self-surrender to the Divine and to his Shakti in us we can attain to oneness and freedom and victory and perfection.  The enemy of faith is doubt, and yet doubt too is a utility and necessity, because man in his ignorance and in his progressive labour towards knowledge needs to be visited by doubt, otherwise he would remain obstinate in an ignorant belief and limited knowledge and unable to escape from his errors. This utility and necessity of doubt does not altogether disappear when we enter on the path of Yoga. The integral Yoga aims at a knowledge not merely of some fundamental principle, but a knowing, a gnosis which will apply itself to and cover all life and the world action, and in this search for knowledge we enter on the way and are accompanied for many miles upon it by the mind's unregenerated activities before these are purified and transformed by a greater light: we carry with us a number of intellectual beliefs and ideas which are by no means all of them correct and perfect and a host of new ideas and suggestions meet us afterwards demanding our credence which it would be fatal to seize on and always cling to in the shape in which they come without regard to their possible error, limitation or imperfection. And indeed at one stage in the Yoga it becomes necessary to refuse to accept as definite and final any kind of intellectual idea or opinion whatever in its intellectual form and to hold it in a questioning suspension until it is given its right place and luminous shape of truth in a spiritual experience enlightened by supramental knowledge. And much more must this be the case with the desires or impulsions of the life mind, which have often to be provisionally accepted as immediate indices of a temporarily necessary action before we have the full guidance, but not always clung to with the soul's complete assent, for eventually all these desires and impulsions have to be rejected or else transformed into and replaced by impulsions of the divine will taking up the life movements. The heart's faith, emotional beliefs, assents are also needed upon the way, but cannot be always sure guides until they too are taken up, purified, transformed and are eventually replaced by the luminous assents of a divine Ananda which is at one with the divine will and knowledge. In nothing in the lower nature from the reason to the vital will can the seeker of the Yoga put a complete and permanent faith, but only at last in the spiritual truth, power, Ananda which become in the spiritual reason his sole guides and luminaries and masters of action. 
    Tnd yet faith is necessary throughout and at every step because it is a needed assent of the soul and without this assent there can be no progress. Our faith must first be abiding in the essential truth and principles of the Yoga, and even if this, is clouded in the intellect, despondent in the heart, outwearied and exhausted by constant denial and failure in the desire of the vital mind, there must be something in the innermost soul which clings and returns to it, otherwise we may fall on the path or abandon it from weakness and inability to bear temporary defeat, disappointment, difficulty and peril. In the Yoga as in life it is the man who persists unwearied to the last in the face of every defeat and disillusionment and of all confronting, hostile and contradicting events and powers who conquers in the end and finds his faith justified because to the soul and Shakti in man nothing is impossible. And even a blind and ignorant faith is a better possession than the sceptical doubt which turns its back on our spiritual possibilities or the constant carping of the narrow pettily critical uncreative intellect, asuya, which pursues our endeavour with a paralysing incertitude. The seeker of the integral Yoga must however conquer both these imperfections. The thing to which he has given his assent and set his mind and heart and will to achieve, the divine perfection of the whole human being, is apparently an impossibility to the normal intelligence, since it is opposed to the actual facts of life and will for long be contradicted by immediate experience, as happens with all far-off and difficult ends, and it is denied too by many who have spiritual experience but believe that our present nature is the sole possible nature of man in the body and that it is only by throwing off the earthly life or even all individual existence that we can arrive at either a heavenly perfection or the release of extinction. In the pursuit of such an aim there will for long be plenty of ground for the objections, the carpings, asuya, of that ignorant but persistent criticising reason which founds itself plausibly on the appearances of the moment, the stock of ascertained fact and experience, refuses to go beyond and questions the validity of all indices and illuminations that point forward; and if he yields to these narrow suggestions, he will either not arrive or be seriously hampered and long delayed in his journey. On the other hand, ignorance and blindness in the faith are obstacles to a large success, invite much disappointment and disillusionment, fasten on false finalities and prevent advance to greater formulations of truth and perfection. The Shakti in her workings will strike ruthlessly at all forms of ignorance and blindness and all even that trusts wrongly and superstitiously in her, and we must be prepared to abandon a too persistent attachment to forms of faith and cling to the saving reality alone. A great and wide spiritual and intelligent faith, intelligent with the intelligence of that larger reason which assents to high possibilities, is the character of the sraddha needed for the integral Yoga. 
    This shraddha — the English word faith is inadequate to express it — is in reality an influence from the supreme Spirit and its light a message from our supramental being which is calling the lower nature to rise out of its petty present to a great self-becoming and self-exceeding. And that which receives the influence and answers to the call is not so much the intellect, the heart or the life mind, but the inner soul which better knows the truth of its own destiny and mission. The circumstances that provoke our first entry into the path are not the real index of the thing that is at work in us. There the intellect, the heart, or the desires of the life mind may take a prominent place, or even more fortuitous accidents and outward incentives; but if these are all, then there can be no surety of our fidelity to the call and our enduring perseverance in the Yoga. The intellect may abandon the idea that attracted it, the heart weary or fail us, the desire of the life mind turn to other objectives. But outward circumstances are only a cover for the real workings of the spirit, and if it is the spirit that has been touched, the inward soul that has received the call, the sraddha will remain firm and resist all attempts to defeat or slay it. It is not that the doubts of the intellect may not assail, the heart waver, the disappointed desire of the life mind sink down exhausted on the wayside. That is almost inevitable at times, perhaps often, especially with us, sons of an age of intellectuality and scepticism and a materialistic denial of spiritual truth which has not yet lifted its painted clouds from the face of the sun of a greater reality and is still opposed to the light of spiritual intuition and inmost experience. There will very possibly be many of those trying obscurations of which even the Vedic Rishis so often complained, "long exiles from the light," and these may be so thick, the night on the soul may be so black that faith may seem utterly to have left us. But through it all the spirit within will be keeping its unseen hold and the soul will return with a new strength to its assurance which was only eclipsed and not extinguished, because extinguished it cannot be when once the inner self has known and made its resolution. The Divine holds our hand through all and if he seems to let us fall, it is only to raise us higher. This saving return we shall experience so often that the denials of doubt will become eventually impossible and, when once the foundation of equality is firmly established and still more when the sun of the gnosis has risen, doubt itself will pass away because its cause and utility have ended. 
    Moreover, not only a faith in the fundamental principle, ideas, way of the Yoga is needed, but a day to day working faith in the power in us to achieve, in the steps we have taken on the way, in the spiritual experiences that come to us, in the intuitions, the guiding movements of will and impulsion, the moved intensities of the heart and aspirations and fulfilments of the life that are the aids, the circumstances and the stages of the enlarging of the nature and the stimuli or the steps of the soul's evolution. At the same time it has always to be remembered that we are moving from imperfections and ignorance towards light and perfection, and the faith in us must be free from attachment to the forms of our endeavour and the successive stages of our realisation. There is not only much that will be strongly raised in us in order to be cast out and rejected, a battle between the powers of ignorance and the lower nature and the higher powers that have to replace them, but experiences, states of thought and feeling, forms of realisation that are helpful and have to be accepted on the way and may seem to us for the time to be spiritual finalities, are found afterwards to be steps of transition, have to be exceeded .and the working faith that supported them withdrawn in favour of other and greater things or of more full and comprehensive realisations and experiences, which replace them or into which they are taken up in a completing transformation. There can be for the seeker of the integral Yoga no clinging to resting-places on the road or to half-way houses; he cannot be satisfied till he has laid down all the great enduring bases of his perfection and broken out into its large and free infinities, and even there he has to be constantly filling himself with more experiences of the Infinite. 
     
 

Faith In The Sensation

July 17, 1965

(Regarding the last conversation, in which Satprem complained about his bad nights.)
But I just can't understand why it's always that side that I remember, always the sewers, the filth.... Because all the same there must be another side, mustn't there?
(Mother laughs) The reason is simple: that side is very, very close to the ordinary consciousness, so you remember; the other ... there isn't a sufficient "connection," so when you wake up, you forget.
That's the discouraging thing, besides, because one always remembers the bad side, not the rest!
Maybe it's to see if we don't lose heart. Just this morning ...[[Mother looks "tired." ]]
(silence)
That must be why: it's to see if we bear up - not even that: to see if our FAITH bears up.
(silence)
If we look at the question from a sufficient height, in order to manifest, this Truth-Power needs a response, you follow, and It doesn't want to have any preference: it matters little whether this point or that point, this or that will manifest It; It goes like this (gesture of a massive, general pressure), It imposes itself on the earth-atmosphere, and what's capable of responding responds. And then, on the point that responds, the Force manifests.
It isn't the Force that selects the point (I don't know if I am making myself understood): it is a global action, and what's capable of responding responds.
As for us, we want It, we aspire for It, we even know, and naturally, because we know, we have a sort of conviction that we are cut out to respond.... But it's not a question of conviction: it has to be a fact.
And for that ... well, we must bear up.
(silence)
On the contrary, I have the feeling that those who know more can do more, and more is asked of them - it isn't that they are asked less: they are asked more.
And this body still belongs almost entirely to the old creation. And its own tendency is to say, "Oh, that's not nice! We have goodwill, and the more goodwill we have, the more is demanded from us." But these are very human notions, very human.... The more goodwill we have, the more is asked of us - not because of some decision or other: spontaneously, quite naturally.
We speak of transformation, even of transfiguration, but there is the passage from the old movement to the new movement, from the old status to the new status, which is a break in equilibrium; and always, for what still belongs to the old creation, a dangerous break in equilibrium is what gives you the feeling that everything eludes you, that you have lost your foothold. And that's when you need unwavering faith. But a faith that isn't like mental faith, which is self-supporting: it is a faith in the sensation. And that (Mother shakes her head) is very difficult.
(silence)
It's always the same thing: the old system of solitude is relatively very easy: you lie down, cut off all connections, remain in deep contemplation, and wait for the crisis to be over. It lasts for a time, you don't know how long. But when you are like this, surrounded with people, work, responsibilities (not moral ones: material ones), with things that materially depend on you, then ... you must find the way to go on, but without having anymore the support of the usual equilibrium.
It's a bit hard.
But it is clear that if we say, "I am here because of You and for
You and at Your service," well, it has to be true, that's all.
***
(Satprem returns to the attack and asks Mother for her permission to publish some of these conversations in the "Notes on the Way":)
No.
I would have made cuts in them, at least.
Oh, but it's more than cuts!
We have to cut the whole lot? All right!
No, but you can take selected passages - if they are impersonal.
Yes, but if we take "selected passages" (it can be done), then it takes on a dogmatic character. It's like declarations. If we remove the occasion on which it was said, it becomes a dogmatic statement.
Yes, but I don't want to give it. That's categorical.
I quite understand. Only, the danger of those extracts is that it looks like a teaching: Mother decides "it's like this and like that" - whereas it's not "like that"!
Yes, yes! (Mother does not want to hear any more.)
***
(A little later, Satprem proposes he could ask E. to buy magnetic tapes to record these conversations:)
Poor E.! Her husband has ruined her.
She nursed her husband, she even almost brought him back to life, and when he recovered speech and consciousness, the first thing he did was to cut off her means of subsistence and discredit her! To thank her, he spread the word that he was no longer responsible for her. Anyway, that's life for you.[[Mother had already spoken of this case in the conversation of 26 June 1965: the man who was cured of a cancer of the brain but still did not believe in the intervention of a higher force. ]]
Would you like to read her letter?
(extract from E.'s letter, in the original English:)
"... I shall always remember, very vividly, the moment when Your Force took hold and created the rally that even the doctor couldn't understand, the rally that lasted so many weeks. May I tell You the little story?
The patient had been in convulsion, the whole right side of the body twitching horribly, speech impossible. There came an easing of it all, and I remember thinking, Why is that brain signaling that body to twitch so - why? And I took hold of Monty's right hand, seated there, on the edge of his bed. And the two right arms became like a big telephone switchboard hook-up - you know, the long cords. So, through the hook-up I called. I called to the Divine Mother, to You specifically, if I may say so, as is my wont. And this time, the You appeared, not above my head, as is usual, but above the patient's head. And to that You I called three times, 'Mother,' as you once taught me to do. That was all. Nothing more complicated than that. You were there, strategically positioned and I pronounced your Name three times. But there was a great current of Force that went through that telephone hook-up, so to speak, a great Power that came down the great long distance from the You through the little man's ailing brain and on down through his then quieting right arm and up through my long right arm to my think machine. And in that there was a deep peace and knowing. Miss Carter was seated on the other side of the bed, it so happened, at that moment, but she did not know that anything took place, even though I quietly closed my eyes for a bit. Odd, isn't it? It seems even odder as I write it. It was so normal as it took place. And it was so normal when, next morning, all trace of the tremor had vanished and all power of speech had returned to the delighted patient. And greater delight of all observers...."
(11 July 1965)
What do you say about that?
It's interesting.
For my part, I was conscious here.
Our letters crossed in the mail.... The day it happened there, I had the experience here and I perceived the Will act: "Now he is going to get better and recover the use of speech and consciousness." It lasted two days, and hup! (gesture of an abrupt cut) it stopped.
It was exactly when she had over there the experience you have just read. Then, a few days later, I received her first letter in which she said that he had recovered and that his first act had been to vilify her with all those who were giving her credit. So I wrote to her: this is my experience; and she answered me what you have read.
And it stopped dead, with the feeling: now the proof has been made, it's enough. He has lapsed into his coma again[[The letter excerpted above also announced the patient's relapse. ]] - I don't think he will now live long.... Just long enough to prove human ingratitude.
***
Satprem rises to leave:
We must bear up. Besides, that's the only thing we can do - what else can we do?... (Laughing) Keep still.
@

ISBN 2-902776-33-0
Information on ordering   M o t h e r's   A g e n d a   in book form

Thursday, March 28, 2013

Indian Independence And The Minorities




Indian Independence and the Muslims

The Hindu mentality in politics is such that they would a thousand
times prefer British rule to any Mahomedan influence,
even if it be only a little.


That was never the view of the Nationalists, even those who
were ardent Hindus who would prefer Moslem to British rule.

Even if Swaraj itself were postponed for a long time, it would
be less of a shock to anybody in the Ashram than if Mahomedans
got a little right

.
The Asram is not concerned with politics; but I cannot believe
without proof that this is the state of their mentality.
17 November 1932
 http://www.holybooks.com/wp-content/uploads/Letters-On-Himself-And-The-Ashram.pdf

Justin Raimondo: India's 'Amen Corner'

09.01.2002 | Source:

Pravda.Ru

It's amazing, really, when you think about it: no sooner had the Pakistan-India conflict reared up as a consequence of America's "new war," then Israel's amen corner in the US had already taken up the cudgels on New Delhi's behalf. Gee, these guys are fast. That always-reliable barometer of elite opinion, Andrew Sullivan, succinctly summarized the party line in a weblog item entitled "Israel and India": "After September 11 and the president's speech to Congress in which he laid out a clear doctrine of zero tolerance for terrorism, it seems to me our foreign policy is clear. Both Israel and India – at either ends of the Islamic Middle East – must be unequivocally supported in their struggles against Islamo-fascism. Both are democracies; both allow freedom of religion; both have enemies who are friendly with the perpetrators of the WTC massacre." IS HE KIDDING? Whoa! Hold it, dude – freedom of religion? Sullivan, the big Catholic, surely must know about the widespread persecution of Christians, particularly Catholics, since the Hindu nationalists came to power in 1996. That year, the United Christian Forum for Human Rights documented over 120 attacks on Christians by Hindu-fascists. The wave of murders, church-burnings, and other outrages has increased exponentially ever since Interior Minister L. K. Advani, a Hindu hardliner, took his "chariot journey" from a Hindu temple in Gujarat province to Ayodhya, alleged to be the birthplace of the Hindu deity Rama. Like Mussolini's march on Rome, Advani's journey was the signal for the beginning of a new era in the politics of the subcontinent, marking the rise of militant Hindu-fascism as the dominant political force. The Hindu fundamentalist Bharatiya Janatha Party (BJP) quickly grew from a fringe group, with 2 seats in Parliament, to the biggest party on the Indian scene. Advani's march on Ayodhya culminated in the demolition of a mosque there, and coincided with the launching of a program dedicated to "saffronizing" Indian society. UNHOLY SACRIFICE You might think that the term "Hindu-fascism" is as much an overstatement as its antipode, "Islamo-fascism," which we have heard so much about lately from Sullivan, Christopher Hitchens, and the pro-war crowd. Yet what else are we to make of the BJP's official slogan, "One Nation, One People, One Culture" – eerily similar to that of the German Nazis?LINK


However strong the communal and disruptive force maybe, but the Indian society, except for occasional perturbations, has shown its resilience by reverting back to secular and composite values
It is a fact that representation of Muslims in Indian Politics, since the Independence, has been disproportionately low, ranging between 6 – 8%, as compared to their share in the Indian population which is estimated to be around 14%, but believed to be even higher.
The reasons for such low representation are diverse. The lack of effective Muslim leadership may be one. Nepotism and favoritism of influential politicians, majority being non-Muslims, leads to multiple candidates being elected from the same family or clan, is another significant factor for low representation of Muslims. Yet another reason is that many Indian political parties, presumably, believe the electability of Muslims is too low for them to be fielded as viable candidates. The non-Muslims electorate, parties think, won’t vote for them because of their religious identity. Together, these factors have led to a condition where the Muslim community, the largest minority group in the country, has poor representation in the country’s politics.
There are other factors such as affirmative actions in favor of Scheduled Castes/Tribes (SC/ST), which have snatched away a significant portion, roughly 22% of the parliamentary seats and over 27% of the state assembly seats, of constituencies from Muslim candidates.
The Muslims, being nearly excluded from SC/STs, cannot even compete in the election in the reserved seats. And quite surprisingly, it has been observed that there is a deliberate attempt to discriminate against Muslim using the reservation policy.
The fact has been brought to light by media platform such as http://twocircles.net/ that on the one hand, many constituencies where SC/STs comprise the majority of electorates are not reserved for them.
On the other hand, there are a large number of constituencies where majority or a significant fraction of the electorate is from the Muslim community and a small population of the SCs but the seats have been reserved for SCs.
This seems to be a deliberate attempt to deprive the Muslim community of its leadership. Such moves, whether involuntary or deliberate, have further reduced the chances of Muslim candidates winning the election.
Another such apprehension, regarding the Women’s Reservation Bill, seems not entirely unfounded. At present, the level of Muslim women’s participation in public life has been minimal. If the Women’s Reservation Bill is introduced, as it reserves 33% of the seats for women, can very well take away some more of the seats that presently elect Muslim legislators. Given the electoral trends in India, the prospect of the reverse happening, that is, Muslim women getting elected from an otherwise non-Muslim dominated constituency seems negligible.
Considering a total disempowerment and underdevelopment of Indian Muslims in nearly all walks of life as pointed out by the Sachar Committee report, it becomes imperative to think of enhancing the share of representation for Muslims in the political machinery. Hence the question arises: How can the representation of Muslims be increased? What can be done about the affirmative action? Do we need to reshuffle the existing reservation policies? Should there be some political parties exclusively for or dominated by Muslims? Is it better if the mainstream parties provide equitable opportunities to Muslim candidates to participate in the elections?
The issue of the reservation needs to be addressed seriously. The Indian Muslims deserve more affirmative actions as recommended by the Ranganath Mishra Committee, which has recommended that the status of SC should be made religion neutral. This means that those castes and classes among Muslims, whose Hindus /Sikhs counterparts are SC should be included in SC list. This will vastly improve the socioeconomic condition of Indian Muslims in general, and their share in the Political Leadership, in particular.
Towards developing the Muslim leadership, there can be two approaches: Formation of pro-Muslim political parties or providing an equitable share to the Muslim leaders in mainstream political parties. If there are parties exclusively for or dominated by only Muslims’ interests, then the outcome is going to be inefficient and hence, is a loss for everyone.
For instance, when voting is done on the basis of religion/sect caste etc., the criterion for preference is something other than the leadership quality of the candidate. So the leader elected by such a partisan process may not be the best one for the electorate.
Another demerit of such process is that if Hindus vote on religious line in favor of pro-Hindu parties and or pro-Hindu candidates, and then Muslims follow the same and vice versa. Even worse, if the game continues, then Muslims will ultimately be the biggest losers. Since in majority of the constituencies in India non-Muslims dominate the electorate, it will be difficult for Muslim candidates to win the election.
Even if the Muslim candidates win a few seats, the Muslim affiliated parties will seldom have a majority to form the Government so they will be left in the opposition. If the Muslim representatives perpetually sit in the opposition, what benefits are they likely to bring to their constituencies? So the Muslim community ultimately suffers because of the partisan politics.
Another potential, and the gravest, consequence is that such partisan politics of Muslims supporting a pro-Muslim party will give the right wing parties a sound pretext to garner support in religious lines. Consequently, suppose, Hindus start supporting pro-Hindutva parties. This may potentially lead to a complete polarization of the Indian society.
Imagine a nation inflicted with partisan politics; a few Muslim leaders from pro-Muslim parties sitting helplessly in the opposition and reckless Hindu leaders from staunch Hindutva brigades ruling the assembly or parliament!
Can India, composite as it is, survive such a degenerate politics? How many more Babri Masjids will be demolished? How many more Gujarat Massacre will be repeated? Is there any prospect of socioeconomic development is such a scenario?
A partisan politics may, in the short run, benefit the right wing fundamentalist Hindutva parties but this is a mistake the Muslims of India can’t afford to make, since their number does not favor them. Muslims cannot afford to be communal.
The recent developments leading to formation of Muslim dominated political parties and winning quite a few seats in the state elections, except Tamil Nadu, can be viewed as a positive sign of change.
This shows the Muslim communities’ stronger spirit of political participation and increased confidence in the democratic process. However, this should not be construed as Muslims’ victory over non-Muslims. Rather this, should be viewed as, and in fact, is merely an indication that Muslims have not been satisfied with the policies of the mainstream political parties.
This development of Muslim dominated parties and Muslim religious organization such as the Jamat-e-Islami (Hind) joining mainstream politics is a call to the mainstream parties like the Congress,  the CPI (M), the BJP, etc. that there needs to be a thorough change in their mode of functioning, especially, policies of nominating candidates for election.
Eligible Muslim candidates need and deserve an equitable share in the election otherwise things may go against the parties’ interests, and ultimately against everyone’s interests.
The fact that given a chance, Muslim candidates can do well in the election has been proven by the Trinamool Congress in West Bengal. This is an example which other mainstream parties can emulate.
So far, the Muslim community led political parties have refrained from partisanship by inducting non-Muslim members and giving them key positions both in the party as well as while giving nominations. Such a balanced policy is a must for any political party in India, not only for the sake of political correctness, but also for its own survival.
Irrespective of who launches a party, the future course of action of a political party must display the spirit of democracy and utmost secularism; otherwise these new parties will also become the victims of communalism and sectarianism from which the older parties have already been suffering.
The Indian electorate has already dumped the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) for its communal character, signaled the left for its covert rightist bias, and shaken the base of the Indian National Congress for its incapability to maintain a secular character in action.
However strong the communal and disruptive force maybe, but the Indian society, except for occasional perturbations, has shown its resilience by reverting back to secular and composite values.
So it is a challenge before all the political parties, right, center, and left leaning, new and old alike - thrown by the people of the world’s largest democracy that prove yourself by uniting the communities and not by segregating one from the other, by effective leadership and progressive policies or you will be thrown out of the race and out of the place.
Shahidur Rashid Talukdar: Write is a PhD student in Economics at Texas Tech University and blogs at http://glimpsesofatraveler.blogspot.com/

13pic Sanjay Basu Mallick on Adivasi Struggles in IndiaThe following article is based on a talk given by the radical intellectual and activist, Sanjay Basu Mallick of Jangal Bachao Andolan (Save Forest Movement) and NFFPFW (National Forum for Forest People and Forest Workers) recently in Bangalore, who has been tirelessly working among the Adivasis (Indian aboriginals) in Jharkhand for the past three to four decades. While the adivasi struggles (especially in Eastern India) have often been portrayed in the media as a Naxalite (Maoist) led struggle, what is often deliberatly ignored are the many democratic struggles taking place in many parts of Central India against the forces of capitalist globalization, who have started to plunder the rich natural resources in the lands inhabited by the adivasis.
Sanjay Mallick has also played an important role in the Forest Rights Act (FRA) brought in 2006, which despite its flaws and weakness forced the Government to recognize community rights of adivasis all over India. However, like all other well intentioned Indian legislations that could have dented the interests of the profit driven system, this Act also suffers from lack of implementation.
Sanjay started his talk with a famous quote of Marx that all hitherto history is a history of class struggle, but what is also often ignored is the fact that throughout his writing Marx also talks about dissolution of indigenous societies that has been happening for thousands of years. Before the advent of British rule in India, Indian society based around the Asiatic mode of production was mainly a tribal kind of society, a fact that hardly finds mention in the mainstream history books.
What is also not mentioned much in the textbooks is that tribals have revolted throughout the British rule in India, the most famous being the Santal rebellion in 1855, which was the precursor to the well known sepoy mutiny (or the First War of Indian independence) in 1857. The most vicious change brought about by the British in the eastern part of India was the introduction of the extremely exploitative and the feudal Zamindari system that virtually created a feudal landlord (or zamindar) lording over the peasants and the tribals, who were hand and foot bound to the system.
Therefore, the killing and the destruction of the tribal way of life has been a continuous process and was always justified with the excuse that this was inevitable. Now the majority view in the Indian society also believes in this and that sacrifices have to be made for the sake of so called ‘development’ under capitalism. With the opening of the economy in the 90′s and with the advent of neo-liberal reforms came lot of foreign investments and inevitably the increased marginalisation and suffering of the indigenous population of India.
But parallel to this, as a response to the growing adivasi struggles in many parts of eastern India, came the Indian state’s response to try to appease these movements and brought in PESA in 1996 and FRA in 2006 with the intention of undoing the historical injustice wrought on the indigenous communities of India. But both the act deny the ownership of the natural resources to the tribals but grant them community rights over their lands and forests. So therefore the state on the one hand is trying to tame the adivasi movement and on the other hand, is paving way for the corporates to grab the rich natural resources.
It is in this context that one needs to understand Operation Greenhunt, which is essentially a war against the tribal population of India in the name of combating Maoist insurgency and at the same time paving the way for the entry of the multinationals to grab the natural resources. Thus the Indian state is trying to approach the issue with two sets of teeth: one trying to appear democratic and the other, Operation Greenhunt. Also the forest officials in collusion with the bureaucracy and the government have been sold out to the corporates.
Only a handful of tribal villages have benefited from FRA implementation, while thousands of villages have been deprived. For instance in Jharkhand, when the adivasis demanded their share of land as per their entitlement, none of them got more than 1 acre of land, while they were entitled to 7 acres of land as per the act.
Civil society’s response to adivasi issues have not been very encouraging either. While the middle classes all want development at the same time they want some sort of protection to the environment. But do not care much about the people living there who have in fact protected these pristine forests and the natural habitats for thousands of years. The mainstream communist parties (caught in their stages theory of revolution) have neither had any real association with the adivasi struggles nor do they recognise the significant contributions made by these movements and are incapable of doing anything.
9pic Sanjay Basu Mallick on Adivasi Struggles in IndiaLINK

Sunday, March 24, 2013

The Swadeshi Movement And Gandhism


The Swadeshi Movement (1905 – 1910)
and Later Developments


When I read the speeches you delivered before 1910, it seems
to me as if Gandhi had almost copied everything from that—
Swaraj, Samiti, Non-cooperation, and so on. If not outwardly
he must have received these things from you in an occult way.


The whole of Gandhi’s affair is simply our passive resistance
movement given an ethical instead of a political form, applied
with a rigid thoroughness which human nature except in a minority
cannot bear for long and given too a twist which seems
to me to make it harmful to the sane balance and many-sided
plasticity necessary for national life. What with Gandhi, Hitler
and the rest (very different people but all furiously one-sided
and one-ideaed) a large part of humanity seems to have gone off
its balance in these times. 21 September 1934
*
Did you enjoy the article “Fifty Years of Growth” by K. R.
Kripalani in the Visva-Bharati?2 Fifty years of growth refers
by the way to the Congress. About the Swadeshi period he
writes: “Along time was to elapse before we were to appreciate
the infinite possibilities of the muddy waters at hand. In the
meantime something startlingly romantic happened. . . .
“The fountain [of undefiled water] was cut by the fiery
shafts of Tilak, Vivekananda, and Aurobindo, among others.
They gave to Indian Nationalism its fiery basis in India’s ancient
cultural glory and its modern mission. . . . It is always
more beautiful and more inspiring to contemplate the Idea

and be drunk with it than to face the actual facts and touch
the running sores. . . .
“But this spirit, fiery and beautiful as it was, was fraught
with grave dangers. The glory that it invoked and the passion
that it aroused were so intensely Hindu that Muslims
were automatically left out. Not that they were deliberately
excluded. . . . However that may be, it seems now not unlikely
that had the influence of Tilak and Aurobindo lasted
in its original intensity, we might have had two Indias today—
a Hindu-istan and a Pak-istan, both overlaying and
undermining each other. . . .
“However that be, the fact remains that the conditions
of our country being what they were, the beneficial effects of
Tilak’s and of Aurobindo’s political personalities were soon
exhausted, and might, if prolonged, have proved dangerous,
if Gandhiji had not come on the scene. . . .”


Subject, politics,—taboo. Writer Kripalani a “romantic” and
“idealistic” visionary without hold on realities, living only in
academic ideas—so not worth commenting. All the present
Congress lot seem to be men who live in ideas only, mostly secondhand,
borrowed from Europe (Socialism, Communism etc.),
borrowed from Gandhi, borrowed from tradition or borrowed
from anywhere; Kripalani looks down on the oldModerates for
being in a different way exactly what he himself is—only they
were classics and not romantics. So what is the use of reading
their “histories”? However quite privately and within brackets3
I will enlighten you on one or two points.
(1) The Swadeshi movement was idealist on one side (no
great movement can go without an ideal), but it was perfectly
practical in its aims and methods. We were quite aware of the
poverty of India and its fallen condition, but we did not try to
cure the poverty by Khaddar and Hindi prachar. We advocated
the creation of an industrial India and made the movement a
Swadeshi movement in order to give that new birth a field and
favourable conditions—cottage industries were not omitted in
our view, but there were no fads. The Swadeshi movement
created the following very practical effects:
(a) It destroyed the Moderate reformist politics and
spread the revolutionary mentality (as Jawaharlal now calls it)
and the ideal of independence.
(b) It laid the foundations of an industrial India (not
of course wholly industrial, that was not our intention) which is
however slowly growing today.
(c) It brought in the commercial classes and the whole
educated middle class into the political field—and not the
middle class only, while Moderatism had touched only a small
fringe.
(d) It had not time to bring in the peasantry, but it had
begun the work and Gandhi only carried it farther on by his
flashy and unsound but exciting methods.
(e) It laid down a method of agitation which Gandhi
took up and continued with three or four startling additions,
Khaddar, Hindiism, Satyagraha = getting beaten with joy, Khilafat,
Harijan etc. All these had an advertisement value, a power
of poking up things which was certainly livelier than anything
we put into it. Whether the effects of these things have been
good is a more doubtful question.
(2) As a matter of fact the final effects ofGandhi’s movement
have been
(a) A tremendous fissure between the Hindus and Mahomedans
which is going to be kept permanent by communal
representation.
(b) A widening fissure between caste Hindus and Harijans,
to be made permanent in the same way.
(c) A great confusion in Indian politics which leaves it
a huge mass of division, warring tendencies, no clear guide or
compass anywhere.
(d) Anew constitution which puts the conservative class
in power to serve as a means of maintaining British domination
or at least as an intolerable brake on progress—also divides
India into five or six Indias, Hindu, Moslem, Pariah, Christian,
Sikh etc.
(e) A big fiasco4 of the Non-Cooperation movement
which is throwing politics back on one side to reformism, on
the other to a blatant and insincere Socialism.
That, I think, is the sum and substance of the matter.
As for the Hindu-Moslem affair, I saw no reason why the
greatness of India’s past or her spirituality should be thrown
into the waste-paper basket in order to conciliate the Moslems
who would not at all be conciliated by such a stupidity. What
has created the Hindu-Moslem split was not Swadeshi, but the
acceptance of the communal principle by the Congress, (here
Tilak made his great blunder), and the farther attempt by the
Khilafat movement to conciliate them and bring them in on
wrong lines. The recognition of that communal principle at
Lucknow made them permanently a separate political entity in
India which ought never to have happened; the Khilafat affair
made that separate political entity an organised separate political
power. It was not Swadeshi, Boycott, National Education,
Swaraj (our platform) which made this tremendous division,
how could it? Tilak whom the Kripalani man blames along with
me for it, is responsible not by that, but by his support of the
Lucknow affair—for the rest, Gandhi did it with the help of his
Ali brothers.
There you are. On a tabooed subject—it is, I think, enough.
Not at all for circulation you understand and quite confidential.
14 April 1936
SOURCE:http://www.holybooks.com/wp-content/uploads/Letters-On-Himself-And-The-Ashram.pdf