Sri Aurobindo: There is no
transformation there. The supramental transformation is not at all
hinted at in the Gita. The Gita lays stress on certain broad lines of
the integral supramental yoga: For instance: 1. Acceptance of life and
action.
2. Clarification of the nature of the Transcendent Divine.
3. The Divine Personality and its Transcendence.
4. Existence of two Natures — para and apara. Disciple: It speaks of the Para Prakriti and says that advanced souls attain to the Para Prakriti.
A. wrote an article in the Calcutta Review about ''The Advaita in the Gita".
Sri Aurobindo: He finds the idea of transformation of nature in the Gita and also other things contained in The Life Divine. I don't see all that in the Gita myself.
Disciple: A's contention is that there are hints and
suggestions in the Gita that can mean transformation. For instance, it says that
one must become the instrument in the hands of the Divine. Then it says: put a madbhavamagata
— "those who strive become pure and attain to my nature of becoming". Also: nistraigunyo bhava — "becomes free from the three modes."
Sri Aurobindo: There is no
transformation there. The supramental transformation is not at all
hinted at in the Gita. The Gita lays stress on certain broad lines of
the integral supramental yoga: For instance: 1. Acceptance of life and
action.
2. Clarification of the nature of the Transcendent Divine.
3. The Divine Personality and its Transcendence.
4. Existence of two Natures — para and apara. Disciple: It speaks of the Para Prakriti and says that advanced souls attain to the Para Prakriti.
Sri Aurobindo: The Para Prakriti there is used in general terms.
Disciple: Yes. I don't find the
transformation in the Gita. The exposition of the levels of
consciousness beyond mind, their functions, a clear, rational statement
of intuitive consciousness, inspiration, revelation, and the ascent of
the consciousness through the Overmind to the supermind — these things
are quite new and not found even in the Upanishads.
Sri Aurobindo: I think so; the Gita
only opens out the way to our yoga and philosophy. Among the Upanishads
only the Taittiriya has some general idea of the higher terms. The Veda
treats symbolically the same subject.
Disciple: Suppose there is
transformation in the Gita, one can ask what kind of transformation it
is, — spiritual, psychic or Supramental?
Sri Aurobindo: It does not speak of
transformation; it speaks of the necessity of action from a spiritual
consciousness-according to it all action must proceed from a certain
spiritual consciousness.
As the result of that action some change may
come about in the nature which might amount to what may be called
transformation. But in the Gita the instruments of action remain human
throughout (the Buddhi etc.). In does not speak of the intuitive
consciousness.
In our ancient works there is no conception
about the evolutionary nature of the world, or rather, they do not have
the vision of humanity as an evolutionary expression of the Divine in
which new levels of consciousness gradually open up, or are bound to
open up. There is no clear idea of the new type of being that would
evolve out of man.
If all that is contained in The Life Divine
is found entirely in the old systems then it contradicts the claim that
this yoga is new, or at any rate, different from the traditional
methods. Perhaps A. was trying to synthesise the Gita and The Life Divine, (laughter).
source: http://www.aurobindo.ru/workings/purani/evening_talks/1-0050.htm